> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Kevin Chadwick <[email protected]> wrote: > > p.s. Anything special to be planned for 5 or just another number. > > There's been some discussion about resetting the minor version to zero > at that time, but a point of order was raised that that discussion > couldn't proceed until the completion of the vote on switching from > decimal to hex. It appears the 'hex' vote is being split by the > uppercase-vs-lowercase issue... > > Seriously: did anything extra special happen at 2.0? at 3.0? at 4.0? > How many data points does it take to indicate a trend?
Oh stop spreading mistruths, Philip. Everyone in the development group knows that we've decided to move to base 9 from here on out.
