On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 07:47:28PM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote: > Hi there, > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Gilles Chehade <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Upstream we do not really have a strong opinion and we'll do whatever > > makes it > > easier for most maintainers. This means that we're not opposed to adding > > brand > > new configure flags if it can help solving packaging issues, they just > > need to > > be discussed openly so there's a consensus and we don't see new ones > > appearing > > every few days :-) > > > > I don't know how other maintainers feel about this, they may have other > > issues > > with the current flags too, I can only encourage them to speak up. > > > > Oh, and we plan on a new stable release by mid-November, which leaves us > > about > > 3 weeks to sort that out. > > > > According all of that, if everybody except Fedora/RHEL use the same > directory for `smtpd.conf` and `aliases` and happy with it, better not to > do anything in upstream. I will write a tiny patch for Redhat system build. > If other maintainers change their opinion on that (Debian with putting > config into `/etc`, and Archlinux with shipping a dedicated aliases file), > it can be discussed again. >
Well, there's no hurry either we can wait for a few days so other people get a chance to voice their opinion and ideas. -- Gilles Chehade https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected]
