Le samedi 26 avril 2014 07:51:42, vous avez écrit : > you want to use SPF at the very least, but then back it > with spampd or amavisd and run it though spamassassin > that is pretty much a standard stack right there,
I tried to set it up yesterday. Complete failed ! I would really like to have spamassassin cause it has a lot of features that may be useful : check FROM address in an address book check gpg sig obviously, I looked if spamd can look in a mail adress list. It can't ! Do you know some doc explaining how I can integrate spamassassin in opensmtpd ? > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Stéphane Guedon <[email protected]>wrote: > > Le samedi 26 avril 2014 07:20:19, vous avez écrit : > > > Hi John, > > > > > > At 06:04 26-04-2014, John Cox wrote: > > > >Unfortunately the whole point of SPF (unlike Sender-ID which > > > >works > > > >much better and on much the same principles) is that you can > > > >reject > > > >the message before receiving it so you wouldn't have the DKIM > > > >stuff > > > >(which I think requires you to have the entire message?). > > > > > > SPF allows processing using envelope information. DKIM > > > processing > > > can only occur after the entire message has been received. > > > > > > Regards, > > > -sm > > > > I am myself in need for a good antispam solution with opensmtpd. > > > > if dkim (which I don't use yet) and spf are not really working, > > what's the good way (I am already using spamd, not enough !)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
