I agree, it's not simple, but none the less it is true. However I wouldn't waste time on reading or answering mail on my phone. If you receive really important email, and you need to answer such on the phone, you need to use a unique email just for such clients - making sure no spam reaches you at all.
For all other clients Bogofilter works really well and fast on most and you generally don't need to worry about keeping filters in sync. Once bogofilter has learned about a few spam mails it runs like a dream on any client. Compared to say Spamassassin/spamd Bogofilter is at least ten times as fast, much better at recognizing spam, and it can be run on old or "weak" hardware without problems. 2014-05-01 5:37 GMT+02:00 Hugo Osvaldo Barrera <[email protected]>: > On 2014-05-01 03:59, Martin Braun wrote: >> IMHO spam should be dealt with only on the client, not on the server. >> It is not the task of the server to determine what is spam and what is >> not. I know everyone does it, I used to do it too, but it is wrong. >> > > What if I have multiple clients? Eg: desktop, laptop, work laptop, > mobile phone. > > I'd need to run daemonsn on all of those machines, and need to find > mechanisms to keep the spam rules sycned. > I also don't know of any anti-spam filters for my mobile phone. > > In theory, what you suggest is a great idea. But it's not as simple as > it sounds. > >> 2014-04-26 16:26 GMT+02:00 Stéphane Guedon <[email protected]>: >> > Le samedi 26 avril 2014 07:20:19, vous avez écrit : >> >> Hi John, >> >> >> >> At 06:04 26-04-2014, John Cox wrote: >> >> >Unfortunately the whole point of SPF (unlike Sender-ID which works >> >> >much better and on much the same principles) is that you can reject >> >> >the message before receiving it so you wouldn't have the DKIM stuff >> >> >(which I think requires you to have the entire message?). >> >> >> >> SPF allows processing using envelope information. DKIM processing >> >> can only occur after the entire message has been received. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> -sm >> > >> > I am myself in need for a good antispam solution with opensmtpd. >> > >> > if dkim (which I don't use yet) and spf are not really working, what's >> > the good way (I am already using spamd, not enough !) >> >> -- >> You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] >> To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected] >> > > -- > Hugo Osvaldo Barrera > A: No, it doesn't make sense. > Q: Should I include quotations *after* my reply? -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send a mail to: [email protected]
