Hi Gilles, Edgar, Thanks for the quick responses. I’ve changed the rule to: accept from any to any recipient <recipient_whitelist> relay
This seems to work as expected. Still to much in the PF mindset for the syntax :) Hadn’t seen that from/for defaults to local when omitted. Greetings, Frank. > Op 6 apr. 2017, om 16:48 heeft Gilles Chehade <gil...@poolp.org> het volgende > geschreven: > > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 04:01:02PM +0200, Frank Timmers wrote: >> Hi, >> > > Hi, > > >> I???ve got a rule based on recipients, however for some reason it???s not >> matched and therefor the mail bounced. Can anyone tell me if I???m doing >> something wrong? >> > > Yep, > > >> smtpd.conf rule: >> table recipient_whitelist file:/etc/opensmtpd/recipient_whitelist >> accept recipient <recipient_whitelist> relay via smtp://127.0.0.1:10027 >> <smtp://127.0.0.1:10027> > > Your rule lacks 'from' and 'for' so this rule will be similar to: > > accept from local for local recipient <recipient_whitelist> [...] > > which: > > >> /etc/opensmtpd/recipient_whitelist: >> # accept all mails to these recipients >> mon...@example.com <mailto:mon...@example.com> >> ban...@example.com <mailto:ban...@example.com> > > will fail to match recipient since @example.com is not part of "for local", > and ... > > >> Output from ???smtpd -dv -T lookup -T rules???: >> debug: smtp: new client on listener: 0xe253a0 >> 13e045ff1aa2603d smtp event=connected address=192.168.0.10 >> host=client.example.com <http://client.example.com/> > > will fail to match sender since 192.168.0.10 is a network connection and is > not part of "from local" > > -- > Gilles Chehade > > https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg > > -- > You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org > To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org > -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
