> In my opinion, table-ldap from extras is doomed as it relies on a lib > that > is barely maintained and doing LDAP asynchronously is painful.
Are you saying the support for table-ldap may stop in a near future? > I doubt the > code will go much further than it currently does. However, would you still accept patches for ldaps support? > If the table-procexec work I documented on my blog gets pushed to > OpenBSD, > then it will ease the writing of a table-ldap with a modern library. I will keep an eye on this then.
