On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 02:26:27PM +0200, ?loi Rivard wrote: > > In my opinion, table-ldap from extras is doomed as it relies on a lib > > that > > is barely maintained and doing LDAP asynchronously is painful. > > Are you saying the support for table-ldap may stop in a near future? > > > I doubt the > > code will go much further than it currently does. > However, would you still accept patches for ldaps support? > > > If the table-procexec work I documented on my blog gets pushed to > > OpenBSD, > > then it will ease the writing of a table-ldap with a modern library. > I will keep an eye on this then.
I think the plan is to move to the table-procexec. Similar to the filters and you would be able to write an ldap backend in any language. Edgar
