On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 1:56 PM Arthur A. Gleckler <s...@speechcode.com> wrote:
> and under 10.1.90 at HEAD: > > ;process time: 8150 (8150 RUN + 0 GC); real time: 8149 > > > Does anyone have a clue what might have caused this decline? > Naturally, once I sent my message to the list, the numbers under 10.1.90 got substantially better. That's surprising because I haven't changed anything at all. I had narrowed down a huge performance degradation in my own code to the use of read, but the results are inconsistent, so I'll have to keep digging.
