Sounds like looping 3.0 to me...
There's lots of shiny stuff that could be added to Mixxx, but I think we
should keep our eye on what's doable for now...
At least until we can secure our first round of venture capital funding...
:P
Looping 1.0 sounds doable or doable in the near future.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is somewhat off topic, but I've been thinking about this sort of
> thing too. It would be really handy to also have not just a list of
> loops, but a list of cue points, each with an optional name the user
> can type in (and possibly some sort of wiring to hook it up to
> keyboard and midi control).
>
> Being able to overlay loops at random points *is* sampling, as Ben
> mentioned, and I think that should be something separate (though
> perhaps loops could have a "store in sampler" option).
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Mixxx-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
>
--
__
--- == __/ t.O ==--
http://stacktrace.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Mixxx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
