On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Claudio Bantaloukas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I spent a couple of days rewriting the build system to use cmake. I > have used scons in the past and while I can certainly appreciate the > value of having a turing-complete build system, I find it too much for > the needs of most projects. > cmake sports several features: > - out of tree builds > - integrated support for all platforms where Qt runs > - great library finding modules > - cpack for creating installers > - qt support > > [...] > > If you like this, I am willing to work on making this build system > better and to integrate it wherever necessary.
My only exposure to cmake was trying to get LMMS to build on OpenBSD. My impression is that it is neat and tidy when it works, but too dense to figure out when it doesn't. I don't like the way it is so tightly bound to Qt or how cmake still depends on make to build. I might be talking out my ass though. -Nick ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Mixxx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
