On Quinta 04 Dezembro 2008, Michael Pujos wrote: > > Anyways, like I said, my ears are open. I want to be clear that even > > by discussing this, there's no guarantee that we'll accept it. I'm > > interested in learning more about CMake, but I'm cautious because I > > know how much these build systems can be. I haven't had time to play > > with your CMakeLists.txt yet, but if I haven't commented on it again > > by like December 20th, poke me. :) > > > > Thanks, > > Albert > > Here's my 2 cents: > > On Windows, cmake is much much better than SCons. With Scons on a nearly > 3 year old notebook (1,7Ghz, 2Gb RAM) it takes nearly 15-20 seconds on MSVC > before it compiles the first file. It feels very slow and painful. Using > the cmake patch posted on the list, you don't need to launch the slow > python for each compile, and the > build is like any other MSVC project. You can also compile a single file > using CTRL-F7. So to make it short, with MSVC cmake wins hands down. > As both build system do not interfere they can both coexist in the > source tree.
I have a personal branch with 100% cmake done at Mandriva lab. Was done with svn right before the last summer of code merge. Linux only, but ready. If anyone interested, i just drop the patch. []'s -- Helio Chissini de Castro KDE Developer Brasil/South America Primary Contact ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Mixxx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
