Anyone know how D ♯ minor is saved in most people's ID3 tags? What are the plans for the harmonic keys code when running the analyser?
2012/3/22 keithsalisb...@gmail.com <keithsalisb...@gmail.com>: > Hey Daniel, > > Thanks for some great feedback!! Right now I'm just going to focus on > maturing the feature to include "Rating", and finally "Key". > > 1. Do you know how I can create a rating selector with stars like in > the track table view? > 2. Do you know if people have A1, A2, B1 etc in their files for "Key" > or do they have A, B, C sharp etc? > > thanks > Keith > > > 2012/3/22 Daniel Schürmann <dasch...@gmx.de>: >> Hey Keith, Hey Ryan, >> >> for my feeling we are talking about two different features or use cases >> looking at the high end solutions when finished: >> >> 1.) "DJs best friend" who answers the question which song suites best as >> next track >> 2.) "Advanced Search" for "I now a fitting song but ... what was its titel? >> " >> >> for 1.) >> As discussed in https://bugs.launchpad.net/mixxx/+bug/889898. I like the >> Idea to have the special view, only taking screen space (and CPU) if the DJ >> explicit ask "his best friend". Also I like the "automatic" part of this >> approach. Keith did good step heading in this direction. As already >> requested by Jens we should add an additional crate selection. What about >> having a (static) preselected set of Crates for the evening. And a quick >> selectable active Crate. At the "Active Library Filter GUI" you can just >> select "From All Crates", "From Set Crates", "From Active Crates". >> Changing the Crates state itself can be done via crate context menu like >> "Lock" today. >> >> (By the Way: The (static) preselected Set of Crates could be also use to >> move parts of the library to a netbook or stick for your next guest session >> GSoC: "Library Database Management") >> >> @Keith: do you have already a filter for rating? (At least ..) >> >> With this state we are prepared to do the next step and adding math to the >> Active Library Filter. >> Like weight the current song metatdata and the metadata of the song before >> .. and so on. >> >> for 2.) >> I think it is right that the library search feature from >> ~bloodybeet/mixxx/features_search is powerful but not self explaining. (I >> have never used it). A drawer like GUI for tuning the search statement will >> be very useful. Clementine-player has a nice search GUI, not suitable as it >> is but maybe a good starting point. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Daniel >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Am 22.03.2012 04:00, schrieb keithsalisb...@gmail.com: >> >>> Hey Ryan, >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> I really like the idea of linking it up to the new search stuff - >>> makes perfect sense really - and that way the "active" part of "active >>> filter" is just that its listening to the currentDeckPlaying event. As >>> for UI stuff - I'll have a play around, I've never been much of a UI >>> developer so I'll do what I can. >>> >>> I would like to get my code reviewed before attempting to hack into >>> the existing views though. Who would you suggest I contact for that? >>> Should I be writing tests? If so, is there any docs to get me started? >>> >>> I'm forked off trunk btw - some one mentioned the history feature! In >>> fact that's affecting my search results because played tracks always >>> appear in the results. >>> >>> thanks >>> keith >>> >>> On 21 March 2012 18:27, RJ Ryan<russelljr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey Keith, >>>> >>>> Nice work! I like your idea of making this possible to do in any view. I >>>> think there are two main problems you should figure out how to solve if >>>> you're going to follow up on that: >>>> >>>> 1) How to make the checkboxes visible in any library-table-view, but >>>> hidable >>>> so they don't waste vertical real-estate. >>>> >>>> Maybe a tiny down-arrow button at the top right of the library that when >>>> clicked will slide the "filter panel" down? >>>> >>>> Maybe you could even experiment with totally changing the library layout. >>>> Take the search box out of the top-left of the library and instead make a >>>> search icon (again maybe hovering at the top-right?) that when clicked >>>> rolls-down the search box and your filter checkboxes. It sounds like some >>>> fun stuff to experiment with. >>>> >>>> 2) When you click a checkbox (again, thinking about showing the >>>> checkboxes >>>> in any library view), I think it should simply append search query terms >>>> to >>>> your current search query using some of the work by Bart Verstrynge on >>>> advanced search operators as a jumping off point. >>>> >>>> For example -- if you click "similar BPM", it should append "~bpm" to >>>> your >>>> search box, which is the advanced search operator for "similar BPM to the >>>> currently loaded tracks". And if you cilck "similar Key" it should just >>>> append "~key" to your search. This has the added benefit of educating >>>> users >>>> on how to use the advanced search operators. >>>> >>>> Are you basing your work off of trunk or the 1.10 branch? There is a >>>> fancy >>>> new session history feature in trunk. :) >>>> >>>> RJ >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:25 PM, keithsalisb...@gmail.com >>>> <keithsalisb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Yves, >>>>> >>>>>> Another thing that comes to my mind is to display tracks (on top of the >>>>>> list?) that you've played often in combination with the currently >>>>>> playing track. But I'm not sure if you have that kind of information in >>>>>> mixxx. >>>>> >>>>> That's something that might fit into what I have in mind for my next >>>>> little contribution - a "history" view - because apparently the data >>>>> is being stored somewhere, so its only fair to let the user have >>>>> access to us and be able to use it - for example to create playlists - >>>>> or crates. >>>>> >>>>> By the way, my branch is quite stable now, so if you want to give it a >>>>> try and provide some feedback that would be great! >>>>> >>>>> bzr branch lp:~keithsalisbury/mixxx/track_selector_feature >>>>> >>>>> While on the subject, does anyone know the procedure for proposing a >>>>> merge - I'm not there quite yet, but would be good to know. Do i need >>>>> to write some tests? Does the code need to be reviewed by someone? ie, >>>>> someone who knows C++!! lol There's probably some questionable design >>>>> patterns in my code - not least that my model is binding itself to the >>>>> view!!! (I thought that was the job of the controller!) >>>>> >>>>> cheers >>>>> Keith >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> This SF email is sponsosred by: >>>>> Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here >>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Get Mixxx, the #1 Free MP3 DJ Mixing software Today >>>>> http://mixxx.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Mixxx-devel mailing list >>>>> Mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > keithsalisb...@gmail.com -- keithsalisb...@gmail.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Get Mixxx, the #1 Free MP3 DJ Mixing software Today http://mixxx.org Mixxx-devel mailing list Mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
