PLEASE, let's not go the route of the Chrome/Firefox model. I _hate_ that.
Major versions should be reserved for changes that are not
backwards-compatible, like they were originally intended.
And at the risk of angering our lead developer, I think Chrome did it first. ;-)
________________________________
From: Owen Williams <owilli...@mixxx.org>
To: mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Mixxx-devel] djworx tl;dr: Mixxx needs effects
Or we could drop the "1." and just call this release Version 11. That's
sort of the chrome/firefox model.
(At least it's not 0.9.9.11BETA)
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 23:13 +0200, William Good wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Owen Williams <owilli...@mixxx.org> wrote:
> > And apparently our version numbers are too low?? That's a weird
> > complaint.
> >
>
> Meh, it seems that's always an issue people have with OSS. The authors
> have some sort of vision for the next "major" release, and everyone
> else just expects every non-bugfix release to increment the major
> version number (as happens with most commercial software). At some
> point in Linux 2.x, Linus said "whatever, here's Linux 3.0."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete
security visibility with the essential security capabilities. Easily and
efficiently configure, manage, and operate all of your security controls
from a single console and one unified framework. Download a free trial.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/alienvault_d2d
_______________________________________________
Get Mixxx, the #1 Free MP3 DJ Mixing software Today
http://mixxx.org
Mixxx-devel mailing list
Mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
