Hi Daniel, sorry didn't see your post until now.
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 21:10:24 +0200 Daniel Schürmann <daschuer-opwvymzfgylytjvyw6y...@public.gmane.org> wrote: > Hi petah, > > I am thinking for a while for a similar solution for Mixxx. IMHO this could > be relay great addition to have an addition IPC automation interface for > Mixxx. > > It would be nice if you could describe some more details of your project. My project is pretty single-minded, I put the source code and as much info as bearable on www.hackerdjs.com/software/cdj2midi.html (no more URL posting lest I get branded a poser:) > Here some unsorted points: > * OSC: would be a nice addition for Mixxx, but IMHO there is no strong > demand because of a special use case. We may update our Wiki > http://www.mixxx.org/wiki/doku.php/osc_backend if we have any. I think OSC's #1 advantage is it's backwards-compatible with MIDI but has much more data resolution. All the discovery/learn stuff is overkill because so few other software implement it. I wrote an OSC client using OSCpack a while back and it's simple enough. > * Qmidinet <http://qmidinet.sourceforge.net/qmidinet-index.html>, is a nice > Midi UDP solution which works fine with Mixxx. It would be nice if we > implement it's Interface within Mixxx itself. That sounds great, I'll check it out. OSC is also UDP-based btw. > * MPRIS-Dbus interface: This should be not a big deal to implemet because > of the very well Qt Dbus interface. But a lot of work anyway. > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mixxx/+spec/dbus > http://www.mail-archive.com/mixxx-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org/msg04684.html I've never written to a DBus so can't comment one way or another. > * alsa snd_seq: Let your application be a midi device. Then you can use the > full power of midi scripting inside Mixxx. http://fundamental-code.com/midi/ Vanilla MIDI doesn't really solve my problem with is resolution. > Hope that heps! Definitely does, will check out the links, thx! -- p > Kind regards, > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > > 2013/7/6 petah <mixxx-356rgwljecpbdgjk7y7...@public.gmane.org> > > > I'm looking for a quick loopback path between my stdalone app and Mixxx; > > I'm guessing a Javascript server to receive OSC messages is too tall an > > order. > > > > Any other suggestions to implement a /very basic/ loopback test (with just > > start/stop, say) that doesn't require diving into Mixxx's bowels? For now I > > don't mind if it's Linux-specific, incl. a hardcoded pipe hack. > > > > thx & cheers, > > > > -- p > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > > > Build for Windows Store. > > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Get Mixxx, the #1 Free MP3 DJ Mixing software Today > > http://mixxx.org > > > > > > Mixxx-devel mailing list > > mixxx-devel-5nwgofrqmnerv+lv9mx5uipxlwaov...@public.gmane.org > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Get Mixxx, the #1 Free MP3 DJ Mixing software Today http://mixxx.org Mixxx-devel mailing list Mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
