On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Matt Voss wrote:
> Thanks for the recommendation. However I was wondering if a low-end ($400)
> minidv camcorder would do just as good of a job - or if the Canopus will
> even beat a $2000-$3000 camcorder's ability to convert analog to digital.
Talking from my experince only: I am converting some Video-8 (Analog)
tapes to digital material (Divx).
I have a Sony PC100E miniDV camcorder. First I try to digitize the
Analog material connecting the Analgo camcorder with the Sony PC100E but
I was not satisfied with the results.
Aferwards I got my Canopus ADVC-100 and now everything is different ���
:))
If your main intention is to convert from Analog to Digital
I would go for the Canopus.
Best regards,
--
Javi, _____ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| http://www.europa3.com/users/fjherna/
\_____(X)_(_)_(X)_____/ http://www.valux.org/
____________!___!___!_________Valencia(Spain)
===================================================================
If you learn one useless thing every day, in a single year you'll learn
365 useless things.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger
for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and
disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX
and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
