On Sat, 2003-08-16 at 20:25, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > On 16 Aug 2003, Florin Andrei wrote: > > Even at -b 9000, i still get square artifacts, that's how bad it is... > > It will, from the sounds of it, probably be necessary to give up > a small amount of the detail. Better that than square artifacts, > no?
Definitely. > Try running the data thru "yuvdenoise -l 1" before going to the > encoder. Perhaps that will help. Now, the movie is interlaced, and i want to keep it that way. AFAICT, yuvdenoise will deinterlace it, right? Also, there's no -l 1 option in my yuvdenoise man page. Probably because i'm using 1.6.1 > Did you try using the -N option? A small value might help, > perhaps something like "-N 0.6" would be useful. Using the > alternate quanization matrices might also be of value - perhaps > they would reduce the block artifacts. Yeah, i was looking at it right now. Again, my man page is slightly different, -N has no numeric parameter, but i think that's ok, i'll go with the default. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
