Hi Thorsten,
yes, got that in my mind when I proposed my 2nd alternative,
but it should probably be something like
railway=* & !(tunnel=yes) & (building=no ! building!=*) [0x14 resolution 22]
Or maybe we should add a general rule
building=no {delete building}
somewhere at the start of lines?
Gerd
> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 09:08:09 +0100
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Railway tracks drawn around station buildings
>
> On Mon, Feb 09, Gerd Petermann wrote:
>
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > your post is hard to read, but I think the last solution is the only one
> > that really solves the problem.
> > So I'd vote for
> > railway=* & !(tunnel=yes) & building!=* [0x14 resolution 22]
>
> I have already seen building=no ...
>
> Thorsten
>
> > instead of
> > railway=* & !(tunnel=yes) [0x14 resolution 22]
> >
> > Gerd
> >
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 00:51:57 +0000
> > Subject: [mkgmap-dev] Railway tracks drawn around station buildings
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72614628 is tagged building=yes
> > and railway=station. In the generated map (r3436 and default style), it
> > appears as a railway track following the outline of the building. At
> > resolution 24, the building is not rendered. The tag railway=station was
> > originally on a node on the track representing the stopping-point of
> > trains. The tag was moved to the station building by another user
> > (Christian Quest, no less, president of the board of OSM France). I would
> > not have tagged it in that way, but it is one of several possibilities
> > allowed for in the wiki. There are about 500 stations in France tagged in
> > the same way (half of which have been edited by cquest).
> >
> > The railway track comes from line 166 of the lines style file
> > railway=* & !(tunnel=yes) [0x14 resolution 22]
> > Many values of the railway tag are in use, so I am not sure what is the
> > best way to prevent railway lines being drawn round buildings. Some
> > possibilities:
> > A whitelist
> > (railway=rail | railway=tram | railway=disused | railway=subway |
> > railway=narrow_gauge | railway=light_rail | railway=preserved) &
> > !(tunnel=yes) [0x14 resolution 22]
> > A blacklist
> > railway=* & railway!=station & railway!=construction & railway!=razed &
> > railway!=dismantled & !(tunnel=yes) [0x14 resolution 22]
> > (The whitelist and blacklist are based on the frequency of tags according
> > to taginfo
> > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/railway?filter=ways#values )
> > Test for buildings
> > railway=* & !(tunnel=yes) & building!=* [0x14 resolution 22]
> >
> > I prefer the whitelist because it gives you better control: you know
> > exactly which tags are going to be rendered. Any thoughts?
> >
> > Adrian
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > mkgmap-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
>
> --
> Thorsten Kukuk, Senior Architect SLES & Common Code Base
> SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany
> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham
> Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
