Hi Bernd, you are probably right that the whilelist is the better solution. I did not understand that the combination of railway=station and building=yes makes perfect sense while the other tags in the proposed whilelist do not.
So, I'd say now that we should replace the line 166 railway=* & !(tunnel=yes) [0x14 resolution 22] by (railway=rail | railway=tram | railway=disused | railway=subway | railway=narrow_gauge | railway=light_rail | railway=preserved) & !(tunnel=yes) [0x14 resolution 22] If I here no complains I'll commit this tomorrow. Gerd > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:23:39 +0100 > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Railway tracks drawn around station buildings > > Am Montag, 9. Februar 2015, 09:11:43 schrieb Gerd Petermann: > Hi Gerd > > > yes, got that in my mind when I proposed my 2nd alternative, > > but it should probably be something like > > railway=* & !(tunnel=yes) & (building=no ! building!=*) [0x14 resolution 22] > > > > Or maybe we should add a general rule > > building=no {delete building} > > > > somewhere at the start of lines? > > I have problems to understand, why you're using such catchalls like > railway=*.... in lines, IMHO it is better to use exact rules > > railway=station as polygons are buildings and should be treated like that > > [points] default GARMIN symbol > railway=station | railway=halt [0x2f08 resolution 23] > > no entry for railway=station in lines or polygons > > [lines] > railway=rail [0x14 resolution 22] > > [polygons] > building!=no [0x13 resolution 24 continue with_actions] > > this is shortened what we used in our styles, > > Bernd > > -- > amarok2 now playing: > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
railway-v1.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
