Ok, so we'll stick to tinyMCE and edit on drupal itself.
The problem is that drupal is not ideally suited to collaborative
editing, even with books.
Raph, I like the idea of collaborative editing, but its good to keep
track of who wrote what.
e.g. you removed my reference to dead cows, I like dead cows (BBQed
are best) but it wasn't the most tasteful of examples!
OTOH "cube" is not in my vocabulary of cooking, cubes in food are very
much like adware in computers ... avoid if possible, but acceptable if
no alternative exists, I'm thinking of re-writing that using ravjul or
something as an example.

Also I did not specify a licence ..... presumable its cc-by-sa ...
should all website content be cc-by-sa by default?
The thing is that I would really like to claim authorship, and send it
to a couple of people I know.
BTW the images used are all from wikipedia commons. (i.e. technically
I need to attribute authorship)

I started writing an other writeup as a book. its not marked as
published. Is it visible to editors?

BTW for the compiz demo look here: http://www.ubuntuvideo.com/

Philip

2008/6/24 Sebastian Cachia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I had used FCKeditor for a while after I got pissed off with TinyMCE
> filtering out parts of my HTML code. In the end I wasn't overly satisfied
> and switched to JCE (on Joomla). All in all I wouldn't say that a move from
> TinyMCE to FCK is worth it.
>
> I will have a look and see how I can help out with both /ricetta and
> /discover.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>
>
_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

Reply via email to