I have run MediaWiki a number of times. Its probably the one I got to use the most.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:31 AM, James Attard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mediawiki. i'm currently deploying one for my company. remember i asked you > guys about a software to manage configuration changes? i think a wiki engine > is perfect. > > for madvip.net i deployed a test mediawiki - if you want to test it you're > welcome > > james > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Raphael Borg Ellul Vincenti < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I agree, that as it stands it is a major pain for collaborative editing. >> However if you want to retain ownership of the article, then you should >> write the article in private and then publish it up on the website. My >> understanding was that the article was a joint effort. I will leave you at >> it. >> >> If we shall go for a proper wiki, we can host it anyway at >> www.linux.org/wiki (scrap the current one) and use it as a dumping ground >> for articles which are still to be published. Once they are fit for prime >> time, we then shift them to the main website. >> >> Now.... which wiki to use ? >> >> -- >> Raphael >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Philip Serracino Inglott < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Ok, so we'll stick to tinyMCE and edit on drupal itself. >>> The problem is that drupal is not ideally suited to collaborative >>> editing, even with books. >>> Raph, I like the idea of collaborative editing, but its good to keep >>> track of who wrote what. >>> e.g. you removed my reference to dead cows, I like dead cows (BBQed >>> are best) but it wasn't the most tasteful of examples! >>> OTOH "cube" is not in my vocabulary of cooking, cubes in food are very >>> much like adware in computers ... avoid if possible, but acceptable if >>> no alternative exists, I'm thinking of re-writing that using ravjul or >>> something as an example. >>> >>> Also I did not specify a licence ..... presumable its cc-by-sa ... >>> should all website content be cc-by-sa by default? >>> The thing is that I would really like to claim authorship, and send it >>> to a couple of people I know. >>> BTW the images used are all from wikipedia commons. (i.e. technically >>> I need to attribute authorship) >>> >>> I started writing an other writeup as a book. its not marked as >>> published. Is it visible to editors? >>> >>> BTW for the compiz demo look here: http://www.ubuntuvideo.com/ >>> >>> Philip >>> >>> 2008/6/24 Sebastian Cachia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> > I had used FCKeditor for a while after I got pissed off with TinyMCE >>> > filtering out parts of my HTML code. In the end I wasn't overly >>> satisfied >>> > and switched to JCE (on Joomla). All in all I wouldn't say that a move >>> from >>> > TinyMCE to FCK is worth it. >>> > >>> > I will have a look and see how I can help out with both /ricetta and >>> > /discover. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > MLUG-list mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> MLUG-list mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MLUG-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> >> > > > -- > James Attard > http://www.madvip.net > http://www.jamesattard.com > _______________________________________________ > MLUG-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list > >
_______________________________________________ MLUG-list mailing list [email protected] http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
