nothing too heavy, nothing too light ? On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Raphael Borg Ellul Vincenti < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree, that as it stands it is a major pain for collaborative editing. > However if you want to retain ownership of the article, then you should > write the article in private and then publish it up on the website. My > understanding was that the article was a joint effort. I will leave you at > it. > > If we shall go for a proper wiki, we can host it anyway at > www.linux.org/wiki (scrap the current one) and use it as a dumping ground > for articles which are still to be published. Once they are fit for prime > time, we then shift them to the main website. > > Now.... which wiki to use ? > > -- > Raphael > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Philip Serracino Inglott < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Ok, so we'll stick to tinyMCE and edit on drupal itself. >> The problem is that drupal is not ideally suited to collaborative >> editing, even with books. >> Raph, I like the idea of collaborative editing, but its good to keep >> track of who wrote what. >> e.g. you removed my reference to dead cows, I like dead cows (BBQed >> are best) but it wasn't the most tasteful of examples! >> OTOH "cube" is not in my vocabulary of cooking, cubes in food are very >> much like adware in computers ... avoid if possible, but acceptable if >> no alternative exists, I'm thinking of re-writing that using ravjul or >> something as an example. >> >> Also I did not specify a licence ..... presumable its cc-by-sa ... >> should all website content be cc-by-sa by default? >> The thing is that I would really like to claim authorship, and send it >> to a couple of people I know. >> BTW the images used are all from wikipedia commons. (i.e. technically >> I need to attribute authorship) >> >> I started writing an other writeup as a book. its not marked as >> published. Is it visible to editors? >> >> BTW for the compiz demo look here: http://www.ubuntuvideo.com/ >> >> Philip >> >> 2008/6/24 Sebastian Cachia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > I had used FCKeditor for a while after I got pissed off with TinyMCE >> > filtering out parts of my HTML code. In the end I wasn't overly >> satisfied >> > and switched to JCE (on Joomla). All in all I wouldn't say that a move >> from >> > TinyMCE to FCK is worth it. >> > >> > I will have a look and see how I can help out with both /ricetta and >> > /discover. >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > MLUG-list mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> MLUG-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ > MLUG-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list > >
_______________________________________________ MLUG-list mailing list [email protected] http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
