I went to wikipedia, but all it says is that she had one of the most successful pay per call networks ever. Doesn't say what, if anything, brought her down... Please add it to wikipedia, and I'll read it there ;-)
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Oulton <[email protected]>wrote: > Can't we all just wait for 30 days and THEN talk about it? :) I'd > give them the benefit of the doubt until then, and then hey... > whatever. This isn't Jo-Jo's Psychic Alliance (remember what happened > to her? Now THAT'S irony). > > Andrew > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Nicholas Accad <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Valery Shaevitch <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Oh, some words here just giving me a thinking attack ))) > >> > >>>> ........ I was a kubuntu user for years but had recently > >>> > switched to the gnome stream because of all the little things that > >> Stick to what you are used to > >> > >> > >>> > unspeakably bad that I don't even have the courage to submit a bug > >>> > report, it isn't even close to being usable, it just feels like a > >>> > complete waste of time. Seriously, Canonical cannot be serious > >>> > about this. It isn't going to work. > >> > >> Yes, may be. My first program was as smelling as my first diaper .... > >> So, it is YOUR own choice to or not to use alpha/beta test releases > >> Get yourself a $Windows7$ and see how it communicates to your hardware > >> Also, the Unity (which I personally dislike) can switched off > >> It is YOUR OWN choice > >> > >> Few years ago I disliked the idea of GL-based screen switch > >> Now I adore it (+ it gave me more understanding of GL itself) > >> > >> The hardware and software (including the operating system) must > >> be in harmony. But if we speak about GPL software, then > >> you should realize that it is FREE as a BEER. > >> Get it for free and use it. > >> If you cannot understand how it works, hire a consultant or > >> study yourself. Canonical just works for you same way > >> > >> Is it true, people ??? > >> > >> > > > > Not true. > > > > It is one thing to bash Windows-only users who bash Linux just because > > they have no idea, it is another thing to bash a fellow old time Linux > > user who does know what he is doing, you have fallen in the latter > > category. > > > > I don't personally know Peter, I don't know you either, but I do know > > that almost everyone in this thread is acting like a zealot just > > because one of us dared to criticize Ubuntu. OH NOs! > > > > I am NOT an Ubuntu user, I haven't touch Ubuntu except once a very > > long time ago when they came out, so I have nothing to say about their > > technical issues, but from what I have been following in the Linux > > world, the Ubuntu fan boys and girls are worse than the Mac crowd. > > > > Instead of engaging Peter in a discussion and trying to figure out if > > there is something that can be done to help, you all basically called > > him an idiot who has no idea what software-alpha is, honestly, you > > make me ashamed. > > > > Peter, I apologize on behalf of MLUG, you did not deserve this, and I > > agree with you, if a piece of software is that bad 30 days before > > release date, I don't see how it can be made into a production ready > > system. > > > > Thank you > > > > -nick > > _______________________________________________ > > mlug mailing list > > [email protected] > > > https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca > > > _______________________________________________ > mlug mailing list > [email protected] > https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca >
_______________________________________________ mlug mailing list [email protected] https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca
