On 5/9/2012 4:11 PM, Jeremy wrote:
On 12-05-09 04:03 PM, Sandro wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 21:52 -0400, Patricia Campbell wrote:
Do you have any $ numbers for EC2 instance usage ? Just for an
example, I have been weighing it instead of an account at iWeb for one
of my clients.
http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/
/SM
This may actually be more useful...
http://calculator.s3.amazonaws.com/calc5.html
For small stuff a normal VPS is more cost-effective I think. You can
still hook it to S3 and have unlimited storage.
You can find 2GB RAM VPS for about $20/mo if you look around.
Jeremy
Not to mention, you don't have to worry about reconfiguration after
every reboot, changing ips, and, and, and...
There are ways around some of these issues, if you're willing to pay.
As Jeremy stated, a VPS is usually an more cost efficient solution if
you're looking to host 24/7. Renting bare metal is expensive, but it
depends on your task.
May I suggest starting a new thread if this subject is to go further and
let the this thread get back to it's original topic. :-)
David
_______________________________________________
mlug mailing list
[email protected]
https://listes.koumbit.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-listserv.mlug.ca
