Rémi Forax wrote: > Ok, I've forget to update that code when the encoding of invokedynamic > bytecode change. > I haven't applied your patch because I think it is simpler to use a > specific case for INVOKEDYNAMIC.
No problem...when you've applied your change let me know and I'll update. I don't think there's going to be any more changes at the bytecode level, right? Can we get this pushed into an ASM release soon? - Charlie _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
