Rémi Forax wrote: > Charles Oliver Nutter a écrit : >> Rémi Forax wrote: >> >>> Ok, I've forget to update that code when the encoding of invokedynamic >>> bytecode change. >>> I haven't applied your patch because I think it is simpler to use a >>> specific case for INVOKEDYNAMIC. >>> >> No problem...when you've applied your change let me know and I'll update. >> >> I don't think there's going to be any more changes at the bytecode >> level, right? Can we get this pushed into an ASM release soon? >> > I've forget to say that the invokedynamic branch of ASM already contains > the fix.
Great, thanks! Now if we can get it into a release, we can ship it. - Charlie _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
