Charles Oliver Nutter a écrit : > Rémi Forax wrote: > >> Ok, I've forget to update that code when the encoding of invokedynamic >> bytecode change. >> I haven't applied your patch because I think it is simpler to use a >> specific case for INVOKEDYNAMIC. >> > > No problem...when you've applied your change let me know and I'll update. > > I don't think there's going to be any more changes at the bytecode > level, right? Can we get this pushed into an ASM release soon? > I've forget to say that the invokedynamic branch of ASM already contains the fix.
> - Charlie > Rémi _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
