Thomas,

>
> Thanks for this detailed analysis on the current status and proposed
> future work for invokedynamic. Can you also add some comments on what you
> believe the advantages and disadvantages of using Truffle instead of
> invokedynamic for implementing dynamic languages on top of the JVM are?
>
> Along those lines, could you tell us if Truffle aims to be a
production-quality system?  I had thought - perhaps incorrectly - that it
was a kind of research project, like (as I understood it) the Maxine VM was
a few years ago.

Thanks!
Patrick
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

Reply via email to