Thomas,
> > Thanks for this detailed analysis on the current status and proposed > future work for invokedynamic. Can you also add some comments on what you > believe the advantages and disadvantages of using Truffle instead of > invokedynamic for implementing dynamic languages on top of the JVM are? > > Along those lines, could you tell us if Truffle aims to be a production-quality system? I had thought - perhaps incorrectly - that it was a kind of research project, like (as I understood it) the Maxine VM was a few years ago. Thanks! Patrick
_______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev