it's not expected !


Le 6 août 2015 20:26:43 CEST, Charles Oliver Nutter <> a 
écrit :
>Pardon me if this has been discussed before, but we had a bug (with
>fix) reported today that seems to indicate that the JVM is rooting
>objects put into a ClassValue even if the ClassValue goes away.
>Here's the pull request:
>And here's one example of the root trace leading back to our JRuby
>runtime. All the roots appear to be VM-level code:
>Is this expected? If we have to stuff a WeakReference into the
>ClassValue it seriously diminishes its utility to us.
>- Charlie
>mlvm-dev mailing list

mlvm-dev mailing list

Reply via email to