No, it's not expected ! Rémi
Le 6 août 2015 20:26:43 CEST, Charles Oliver Nutter <head...@headius.com> a écrit : >Pardon me if this has been discussed before, but we had a bug (with >fix) reported today that seems to indicate that the JVM is rooting >objects put into a ClassValue even if the ClassValue goes away. > >Here's the pull request: https://github.com/jruby/jruby/pull/3228 > >And here's one example of the root trace leading back to our JRuby >runtime. All the roots appear to be VM-level code: > >https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/9213410/class-values-leak.png > >Is this expected? If we have to stuff a WeakReference into the >ClassValue it seriously diminishes its utility to us. > >- Charlie >_______________________________________________ >mlvm-dev mailing list >mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net >http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
