On Friday 08 May 2009 06:36:44 pm Gwern Branwen wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Peter Bienstman > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is because you have not done many reviews yet. The next interval > > basically is the multiplication of the previous interval (5 I guess in > > this case) with the easiness factor 2.6, which will be modified by a > > small fraction (like +/- 0.1 or 0.2) depending on the grade. Since the > > previous interval is still small, all the options more or less round to > > the same interval. > > I noticed the same thing when I started using that plugin, and figured > that it was just rounding. But the internal records *are* being > tracked to greater precision, right? Seems like it could make a > difference in the long run.
Sure! Peter ------------------------------------------------ Peter Bienstman Ghent University, Dept. of Information Technology Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, B-9000 Gent, Belgium tel: +32 9 264 34 46, fax: +32 9 264 35 93 WWW: http://photonics.intec.UGent.be email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
