On Thursday 14 May 2009 03:07:44 pm Damien Elmes wrote: > I will probably address > this by sending across the compressed deck verbatim, instead of > bundling it up into a sync message. Of course, this approach would > never be compatible with other implementations.
Unless these other implementations could import each other's file formats as well.. > An alternative would > be an incremental JSON parser, but that may be complicated to > implement. Not that I know anything about this, but would there be a difference JSON/XML in that regard? Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
