On Thursday 14 May 2009 02:29:59 pm Ed Bartosh wrote: > I like the idea, but a bit concerned about ability to accomplish this > in GSoC timeframe. > We have planned July for this task, so if we manage to design in until > end of June, then I'm for it.
That sounds like a reasonable time frame: June for the design, and July for the implementation. > > I've also contacted Damien from Anki, but he does not seem to be too > > interested... > > (http://groups.google.com/group/ankisrs/browse_thread/thread/410997e06be2 > >2302). > > We can start from looking at Anki's implementation. If it's good > enough and only requires a bit of changes then > we can use it and Damien might be more interested in joining us. > Anyway it makes sense to look at working implementation first in > order to not reinvent the wheel. Definitely. Not sure if all the relevant parts (server code) is open source, but we can have a look. Peter -- ------------------------------------------------ Peter Bienstman Ghent University, Dept. of Information Technology Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, B-9000 Gent, Belgium tel: +32 9 264 34 46, fax: +32 9 264 35 93 WWW: http://photonics.intec.UGent.be email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
