On Tuesday 30 June 2009 03:19:20 pm Patrick Kenny wrote: > Perhaps the reason why I have so few reviews (given the size of my > collection) is that nearly all of my cards are very easy and only take a > few seconds to review each, and thus I miss very few. In any case, I > would be hesitant to change the standard algorithm;
That is definitely not the idea here. > if something were to > be changed, perhaps a way to more naturally postpone and spread out a > pile of overdue cards would be best. That is in fact already there: Mnemosyne presents you with the most urgent cards first and takes the lateness in the the review into account when updating the intervals. The only thing which is not there is 'cheating' with the scheduler counter to limit it to a certain number of cards. But this is purely cosmetic aspect and does not require a change to the scheduler itself. Cheers, Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
