As I mentioned here yesterday, Mnemosyne already now shows you the most urgent cards first, and takes into account how late you are when scheduling. So every time you do X cards, you can be sure that you are doing the most important ones.
I'm not sure how useful it would be to have your future schedule read 80 cards every day for several weeks into the future, as then you'd have no way of knowing how much behind you really are... Still, this could be implemented in a plugin. Cheers, Peter On Tuesday 30 June 2009 11:58:47 pm Francisco Fiuza Jr wrote: > What do you guys think about limiting the number of cards to review each > day? > For example, if I set this value to 80 cards, it will show me only those > cards even though there should be around 200 for this day. > > If you feel you can see more cards, pressing the button 'view more late > cards' would get the next 80 cards. > > It would be very usefull for me. Early this year when I went on vacation, I > had about 1400 scheduled cards. It took me like 3 weeks to review them, and > at the end I had about 350 grade 1 cards. After a session of 80 cards, I > would rather go through those that I forgot giving a grade 1, than to > review all the cards and watch the pile of grade 1 cards increase > dramatically. > > This is probably not the way it was designed, but I think it will have a > good impact on the motivation. It's like: "Oh well, I have 1500 cards to > review, but I won't need to sit for over 3 weeks to keep on my studies." > > Regards, > > Frank > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Peter Bienstman > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Tuesday 30 June 2009 03:19:20 pm Patrick Kenny wrote: > > > Perhaps the reason why I have so few reviews (given the size of my > > > collection) is that nearly all of my cards are very easy and only take > > > a few seconds to review each, and thus I miss very few. In any case, I > > > would be hesitant to change the standard algorithm; > > > > That is definitely not the idea here. > > > > > if something were to > > > be changed, perhaps a way to more naturally postpone and spread out a > > > pile of overdue cards would be best. > > > > That is in fact already there: Mnemosyne presents you with the most > > urgent cards first and takes the lateness in the the review into account > > when updating > > the intervals. The only thing which is not there is 'cheating' with the > > scheduler counter to limit it to a certain number of cards. But this is > > purely > > cosmetic aspect and does not require a change to the scheduler itself. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Peter > > -- ------------------------------------------------ Peter Bienstman Ghent University, Dept. of Information Technology Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, B-9000 Gent, Belgium tel: +32 9 264 34 46, fax: +32 9 264 35 93 WWW: http://photonics.intec.UGent.be email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
