On Tuesday 08 September 2009 11:06:01 pm Luhmann wrote: > On my experience on mnemosyne, I have found that it would not suit well to > early learning. If I keep rating 0-1, the cards come too soon, repeating > all the time whereas what I would wan is to go further on the deck, and > only re-test those cards a few hours later.
Well, obviously you can close the program and come back a few hours later if you feel you're not making any progress. This could be built into the scheduler, but then there is the risk that the scheduler decides you've learned enough cards for now, and should wait a few hours, even though you yourself still want to go on. For early memorisation, I personally prefer being in charge of that decision, which is why Mnemosyne works the way it does. Still, in 2.0 all the infrastructure is in place to write a plugin which schedules at the second level. Writing such a scheduler is not high on my priority list, I'm afraid, as I think it should be guided by the statistical analysis of the logs. Still, if someone wants to write a heuristic, feel free. Cheers, Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
