2009/11/17 le_sacre <[email protected]>: > It seems to me that what Samuel wants is not wholly at odds with SRS; > it would just require a complete reinvention of how Mnemosyne is > engineered. (...) > Of course, this would practically involve rewriting Mnemosyne from > scratch to achieve. But I don't think it's accurate to say SRS is in > general completely incompatible with what Samuel's requesting.
I didn't say it was. In fact I said what you just said! > On Nov 17, 2:17 am, Oisín <[email protected]> wrote: > (ok, maybe you could split the deck > into two files; the cards which are made read-only on some HTTP server > and the schedule information for each student which is writable, but > it doesn't matter because you don't have any system to provide that > individual writable space for each student's schedule information; > once again Mnemosyne/Anki/etc would be nothing more than a displayer > of cards). My point was that, without SOME form of protected filespace, separating the (global for all students) card and (individual for each student) scheduling information would still not work, since other students can still trash or modify either or both files (or if they were somehow read-only, they still wouldn't be able to update the SRS scheduling/grading data). So local SRS systems will not work. Online SRS systems can work around the problem by providing that individual filespace (in fact Anki has a free web-based hosting service which could be used for this purpose), but, as you note, Mnemosyne is not designed for it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=.
