On Sep 24, 1:57 pm, mzatanoskas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 23, 11:02 pm, Michael Campbell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > How do you distinguish "currently using" and "back burner" cards?
>
> Obviously I can't speak for Dan's specific situation, but how it might
> apply to the problem I brought up is:
> Say in preparation for a big chess tournament you enter a bunch of new
> chess openings into mnemosyne. You decide to focus on using these
> openings actively in the tournament. Every time you use, come across
> these openings in a game outside mnemosyne, you get an extra
> repetition that helps you remember the move. No problem here, that's
> probably a good thing to anchor the flashcard info to real life.
> However when you face the card in mnemosyne and rate it a 5, because
> you've been using the opening every day for the past week in your
> tournament, it thinks that the last time you saw it was two weeks ago.
> Mnemosyne decides that 2 weeks is far too short a gap and so the next
> gap is now a month or so. Your chess tournament ends, and now you
> don't play chess every day and don't come across that chess opening at
> all until the next time mnemosyne brings it up a month later. Your
> repetition gaps (including those outside mnemosyne) have therefore
> gone something like 1 day, 2 days, 4 days, (start tournament) 1 day, 1
> day, 1 day, 1 day, 1 day, 1 day, (end tournament) 1 month. That last
> gap was far too long and you forget the card. If you look at cards
> with a very long repetition gap this situation can happen quite
> easily.

Yes, this is a very accurate description of the issue. (Sorry, I
forgot to check this group to see if there had been replies to my
post.)

If Michael meant how do I distinguish current from back-burner cards
in Mnemosyne: I have a separate category for each opening, and
openings that I'm not active playing get a category starting with
"Old".

> As Peter mentioned there's not much mnemosyne can do about this other
> than start mind reading, but the way I try and deal with it is to be
> aware of it, be aware when I'm coming across certain flashcards a lot
> outside mnemosyne and rate those cards correspondingly lower when
> tested. For cards I haven't seen in a long time, I'll also rate them a
> 1 if I struggle at all to remember, to play it on the safe side. This
> is also for the reasons that Oisin mentioned (if I struggle in
> mnemosyne then I don't have a hope in real life).

Yeah - also, when I find that I have more trouble with a particular
category in general, I'll by default rate them 3s or even 2s even when
I remember the cards fine.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to