> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Peter Bienstman > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I wasn't able to easily find the metrics you are referring too, but I > > personally find 100 000 a big number :-) > > I linked directly to the section, so it should've been hard to miss > the table. I recently added some aggressive caching headers, so maybe > a force-refresh would help.
Yes, that helped! Interesting stats, thanks for compiling these! > > I'm all for introducing more people to the SRS philosophy, but I would be > > hesitant to *enforce* it in e.g. language schools. > > 'code is law'. If you read my previous link, you'd see that SRS can be > integrated into tests/quizzes and teaching. This is not *as good* as a > user-specific deck with customized spacings, but it is a great > improvement over current techniques. (And as I pointed out, this flaw > could be fixed by any computer-based learning. The class could proceed > on a crude average SRS schedule of review & learning new material, and > individual students get touched up by individually-generated tests.) It's would definitely be an interesting experiment to try this on a larger scale. Cheers, Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
