Apologies for delay in replying. Re: cards being repeated in the same session: I had 3 repeats in today's scheduled words (i.e. not learning ahead). I'd marked them as 3 the first time they showed up though though they'd probably marked as 4 or 5 in previous sessions. The repeat seemed like a good reinforcement to me so no problems. I'll monitor this during the next week. I think I had so many on Saturday because I was learning ahead of schedule (playing with my new toy!).
Re: acented sound files: will the correction you' ve done be in the next beta release? Re: suffices on file names: I'll be installing Mnemosyne 2 on another computer in the next day or so; I'll confirm the sound file changes then. Out of interest, will the Google Text-to-speech plugin work with Mnemosyne 2? Kind regards Barbara On Oct 7, 7:11 pm, Peter Bienstman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > Sorry about previous null message - fat fingers! > > > I'm giving beta6 a go and it's good stuff! > > Glad you like it! > > > FYI: > > - sound files with accents in the name still don't work (e.g. > > árbol.mp3); > > Thanks, should be fixed now. > > > sorry if I'm jumping the gun here, I know you're still in beta. > > Not at all. Better to send these bug reports now, as opposed to waiting until > the release. Otherwise, what's the point of a beta :-) > > > - when importing from a version 1 database, a small number of the > > sound files gained a _1_ suffix e.g. mano_1_.mp3 within the database. > > I couldn't see any obvious pattern to the file names or the files to > > cause this > > This happens if you use the same sound file multiple times. Mnemosyne will > then > creates a second copy of the file to make sure they don't interfere. > > > (I've edited them now so it's OK). > > You shouldn't really need to edit them in order to get it to work. If it does > not work, then it's a bug, and I'd appreciate you mailing me your mnemosyne > 1.x directory privately. > > > - the repetition algorithm seems to repeat more within the same > > session now; is this intended? > > Could you elaborate a bit more what exactly happens and under what > circumstances? > > The algorithm should be essentially the same. If anything, immediate > repetititons of the same card should be avoided better. > > This being said, I'm aware of a bug in the scheduler where it sometimes gets > 'stuck' on a failed card and does not move to unmemorised cards. Is this what > you mean? > > Keep the feedback coming! > > Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
