On Monday, October 10, 2011 02:56:47 PM silverbear wrote: > Apologies for delay in replying. > > Re: cards being repeated in the same session: I had 3 repeats in > today's scheduled words (i.e. not learning ahead). I'd marked them as > 3 the first time they showed up though though they'd probably marked > as 4 or 5 in previous sessions. The repeat seemed like a good > reinforcement to me so no problems. I'll monitor this during the next > week.
It's certainly not as intended. If it occurs again, could you send me your 'log.txt' file? > I think I had so many on Saturday because I was learning ahead of > schedule (playing with my new toy!). Looks like a bug in learn ahead of schedule. BTW, learning ahead of schedule is not really recommend to be used often. For cramming, there is a shiny new toy which is the cramming scheduler plugin. > Re: acented sound files: will the correction you' ve done be in the > next beta release? Yes. > Re: suffices on file names: I'll be installing Mnemosyne 2 on another > computer in the next day or so; I'll confirm the sound file changes > then. OK. > Out of interest, will the Google Text-to-speech plugin work with > Mnemosyne 2? Needs to be rewritten, sorry... Peter > Kind regards > Barbara > > On Oct 7, 7:11 pm, Peter Bienstman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Peter, > > > Sorry about previous null message - fat fingers! > > > > > > I'm giving beta6 a go and it's good stuff! > > > > Glad you like it! > > > > > FYI: > > > - sound files with accents in the name still don't work (e.g. > > > árbol.mp3); > > > > Thanks, should be fixed now. > > > > > sorry if I'm jumping the gun here, I know you're still in beta. > > > > Not at all. Better to send these bug reports now, as opposed to waiting > > until the release. Otherwise, what's the point of a beta :-) > > > > > - when importing from a version 1 database, a small number of the > > > sound files gained a _1_ suffix e.g. mano_1_.mp3 within the database. > > > I couldn't see any obvious pattern to the file names or the files to > > > cause this > > > > This happens if you use the same sound file multiple times. Mnemosyne > > will then creates a second copy of the file to make sure they don't > > interfere. > > > > > (I've edited them now so it's OK). > > > > You shouldn't really need to edit them in order to get it to work. If it > > does not work, then it's a bug, and I'd appreciate you mailing me your > > mnemosyne 1.x directory privately. > > > > > - the repetition algorithm seems to repeat more within the same > > > session now; is this intended? > > > > Could you elaborate a bit more what exactly happens and under what > > circumstances? > > > > The algorithm should be essentially the same. If anything, immediate > > repetititons of the same card should be avoided better. > > > > This being said, I'm aware of a bug in the scheduler where it sometimes > > gets 'stuck' on a failed card and does not move to unmemorised cards. Is > > this what you mean? > > > > Keep the feedback coming! > > > > Peter -- Peter Bienstman Ghent University, Dept. of Information Technology Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, B-9000 Gent, Belgium tel: +32 9 264 34 46, fax: +32 9 264 35 93 WWW: http://photonics.intec.UGent.be email: [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
