Hi, I’m not sure I’m a big fan of this type of behaviour by default, because it slows down the review process enormously, e.e. more extra clicks for each card.
With respect to the misgrading, a much better solution would be to have an ‘undo grade’ option which you can click if you need it, rather than having a ‘confirm grade’ which need to click every time. Still, this could be implemented as a plugin if this turns out to be popular with more people, but in order to assess the popularity, please do open a uservoice issue so that people can vote for it. Cheers, Peter From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Radoslaw Kuzyk Sent: 23 November 2016 19:28 To: mnemosyne-proj-users <[email protected]> Subject: [mnemosyne-proj-users] Suggestion related to the user interface of Mnemosyne Hi, I wish to suggest some improvement to the user interface of Mnemosyne. It would be a good thing to add another step between assessing an answer and proceeding to the next card - as it was in Supermemo 98, for instance. I mean that, in Supermemo after choosing the mark using buttons on the bottom of a window (screenshot https://goo.gl/uPn5mC), the user was presented with another set of buttons, which were: "Next repetition", "Stop" and "Cancel grade" (screenshot https://goo.gl/U3etl7). The user was then able to correct the grade (if he/she chose the wrong mark accidentaly - what happens quite often). It would improve the repetition process even further when dealing with more complicated items (as on a screenshot - https://goo.gl/5wq2YA). In this example I have to: 1. Repeat the question after the sound-recording 2. Guess the missing part in an example sentence 3. Repeat a phrase in an answer 4. Read and understand all the example sentences in an answer field. It would be a lot better if I am given an option to grade myself after uncovering the answer field, then keeping it on a screen for some time, and then proceeding to the next repetition item (without having to recollect the most suitable grade). I hope you will consider this (I believe useful) improvement. P.S. I considered putting this suggestion to the idea list, but the description had to be too concise. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mnemosyne-proj-users/090e0125-302d-4c45-bf05-e06689e39748%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mnemosyne-proj-users/090e0125-302d-4c45-bf05-e06689e39748%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mnemosyne-proj-users/1edb2bf814074e88a14996473ff95037%40xmail101.UGent.be. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
