On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 19:04:41 UTC+1, ingenthr wrote: > > > Indeed, 3.0 (currently in Beta) has more fine grained control of the use > of memory and some better management of buckets. I know that in the > future, the goal is to allow a much larger number of buckets, but I know > there’s also more to it than the memory management. The 3.0 release moves > in the right direction with more scalability around number of buckets > coming in the future. > > I don’t know what the team is testing to with 3.0, but the 2.5 > recommendation was < 10 buckets. > > I'm probably not going to have a lot of data per "database" - a couple of hundred megabytes at most. If I had a server with 8GB of RAM is it OK to run 8 buckets, each with a 1GB RAM allocation say? I really want to stick to the standard sync gateway if I can, and multiple buckets provide exactly what I need. I don't want to run 8 server for 8 apps if I can help it.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Couchbase Mobile" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mobile-couchbase/61a68a41-3f7b-404f-afb0-e2a7240670b6%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
