> > > You definitely don't need to allocate more RAM than the size of the > bucket. And if your server isn't under heavy load, you should be able to > get away with less RAM — you'll just incur some disk I/O when less > recently-used documents are accessed. > > That sounds like the best solution then, I think the initial Couchbase server setup led me to allocate all my RAM to my first bucket, and my brain went off track thinking I needed large amounts of RAM for every bucket.
I'm glad I asked now, you've saved me a lot of Go programming! :) I learnt a lot digging through the code though. Thanks for the helpful advice Marcus -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Couchbase Mobile" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mobile-couchbase/f2b6568b-b4fc-4bc0-8564-8c4aa9dd7a99%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
