On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 19:26:07 UTC+1, Jens Alfke wrote: > > > > That makes sense - it's why I was looking at multi-tenancy of multiple > gateways in the same bucket, because of the problems of running multiple > buckets on one server. > > > Yes, but your answer implied that you would need to run multiple instances > of the Sync Gateway as well, to host multiple databases, and I was pointing > out that you don't need to. >
Sorry, my mistake, I meant multiple sync gateway databases. What I'm really trying to achieve is multiple apps per server, where the primary security is the channels of sync gateway, but the fallback security of an app not being able to see another app's data if I make a mistake (or through malicious action) that comes from the apps being in separate buckets, and because multiple buckets per server seems an issue (at least < 3.0) multi-tenancy in a single bucket. Marcus -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Couchbase Mobile" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mobile-couchbase/ef9adaa1-4e0b-46ad-a83e-0e1967c53eed%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
