> To be fair, I never thought this argument was entirely sound. Even if we went > with the very very very VERY basic image+text+link, that IS exactly what the > marketplace promo was (we could even very easily allow that link to be an > intent). But I haven't heard anyone suggest here that we disallow running > some privileged JS on click. i.e. we're already way way way past the realm of > basic basic basic snippets.
Sure, if we also allow for arbitrary filtering code to run (so we can hide snippets based on, e.g., Android account characteristics), and don't want to show computed content. But that's part of my point. > But I'm having trouble figuring out what we're arguing about in here. Is it > what we can draw in the box? Or what that can do? I was responding to this bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905262 which seems very strictly scoped to "we have a promo banner, and we'd like add-ons to be able to contribute to it". The project page also alludes to future scope -- "We will also have to create other bundled add-ons in various releases to do things like promote new Sync set up, Marketplace, etc." -- but I wanted to make sure that we didn't lose sight of the overall scope as we're looking at concrete work items. _______________________________________________ mobile-firefox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev
