I agree. We already have the nomobile class and have done so for a while. The noprint class has been removed from sometime and never got reevaluated with the addition of nomobile
Thanks for pointing this out! https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/43852 On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Danny B. <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I found out, that items with class noprint are not delivered to the mobile > version. Is that a bug or feature? If it is feature, then I strongly suggest > to reconsider it and rather set up new class "nomobile" instead. Some stuff > with noprint is useful on mobile, it just does not have a sense to *print* > it. > > > Kind regards > > > Danny B. > > _______________________________________________ > Mobile-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l > -- Jon Robson http://jonrobson.me.uk @rakugojon _______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
