While I certainly agree in principle, do we know how many pages are relying on this feature? Also, some communication would be good.
On 14.01.2013, 22:21 Jon wrote: > I agree. > We already have the nomobile class and have done so for a while. The > noprint class has been removed from sometime and never got reevaluated > with the addition of nomobile > Thanks for pointing this out! > https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/43852 > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Danny B. > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I found out, that items with class noprint are not delivered to the mobile >> version. Is that a bug or feature? If it is feature, then I strongly suggest >> to reconsider it and rather set up new class "nomobile" instead. Some stuff >> with noprint is useful on mobile, it just does not have a sense to *print* >> it. >> -- Best regards, Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]]) _______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
