I am inclined to agree with Jon and make the change - especially considering there has been radio silence about the change on this list, I suspect it will be ok, unless there is a better forum to discuss these kinds of changes (eg wikitech-l)?
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Jon Robson <[email protected]> wrote: > Any further thoughts on this? Should I abandon the patchset...? Does > anyone want to own this problem? > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Jon Robson <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think this is a pessimistic view of things. I don't suspect this > > would have a catastrophic change and we could always add a boolean in > > LocalSettings.php in case we feel this will and need to roll back. > > Realistically the fall out here is going to be a nuisance more than > > anything and certain content will appear that didn't use to. > > > > I personally think the best form of communication is to make the > > change and then deal with the fallout. If something is rendering > > strangely then people will notice and complain and we'll get that > > fixed. This will happen in a much quicker time then spending time > > exploring the impact and communicating and waiting for people to make > > their changes with no incentive. > > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Max Semenik <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> While I certainly agree in principle, do we know how many pages are > >> relying on this feature? Also, some communication would be good. > >> > >> On 14.01.2013, 22:21 Jon wrote: > >> > >>> I agree. > >>> We already have the nomobile class and have done so for a while. The > >>> noprint class has been removed from sometime and never got reevaluated > >>> with the addition of nomobile > >> > >>> Thanks for pointing this out! > >> > >>> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/43852 > >> > >>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Danny B. > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> I found out, that items with class noprint are not delivered to the > mobile > >>>> version. Is that a bug or feature? If it is feature, then I strongly > suggest > >>>> to reconsider it and rather set up new class "nomobile" instead. Some > stuff > >>>> with noprint is useful on mobile, it just does not have a sense to > *print* > >>>> it. > >>>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> Max Semenik ([[User:MaxSem]]) > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Jon Robson > > http://jonrobson.me.uk > > @rakugojon > > > > -- > Jon Robson > http://jonrobson.me.uk > @rakugojon > > _______________________________________________ > Mobile-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l > -- Arthur Richards Software Engineer, Mobile [[User:Awjrichards]] IRC: awjr +1-415-839-6885 x6687
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
