On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Jon Katz <[email protected]> wrote:
> + Analytics > > Tilman, this is great. I find myself enjoying the stats/graphs and > analysis/commentary equally and so far I don't see anything that isn't very > helpful. Two considerations: > ... > > - On a related note, so far the weekly cadence is great. It might > also be that after 3 weeks we realize that a biweekly or monthly cadence is > all we really need. > > Yes, that's been on my mind too - we should loop you into existing conversations about the cadence. My thinking was that to keep such a report worthwhile reading, it should offer some interpretation and context, and I also think there is value in regularly nudging us to examine the data for the impact of unusual events or regressions. > - > > At some point, we will have to solidify this so that we can automate > some/most of it. Perhaps we should chat offline about what your tolerance > is in that regard. > Indeed, as noted in the very first announcement and the earlier Phabricator task, dashboarding most of these is the goal. Looking into options currently. Then again we wanted to keep it flexible at first, and open to feedback - no use building a dashboard for metrics that people tell us they don't find useful. Fortunately, based on the reactions so far, that doesn't seem to be the case. -- Tilman Bayer Senior Analyst Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB
_______________________________________________ Mobile-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mobile-l
