On Jun 7, 2006, at 6:58 PM, Beau Hartshorne wrote:
> On 7-Jun-06, at 6:26 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote: > >> On Jun 7, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Beau Hartshorne wrote: >> >>> Someone submitted a ticket asking for some clarification in the >>> docs: >>> http://trac.mochikit.com/ticket/116 >>> >>> Why we shouldn't just normalize ("camelize", from New.js) the >>> behavior for IE? >> >> Let's go ahead and camelize in the place(s) where it would make a >> difference. The only reason not to is potential difference in >> performance, but that'd be a very premature optimization. > > For backwards compatibility and performance, we can camelize the > two argument version, and leave the three argument version alone. > Should we move camelize to Base? Base seems like a good enough place for it. Ignoring performance, is backwards compatibility even an issue? I don't think it would break anything to camelize everywhere appropriate. -bob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
