On Jun 9, 2006, at 6:15 PM, Beau Hartshorne wrote:
> > On 7-Jun-06, at 7:13 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote: > >> Base seems like a good enough place for it. Ignoring performance, >> is backwards compatibility even an issue? I don't think it would >> break anything to camelize everywhere appropriate. > > I don't really know. I replaced computedStyle entirely, and added a > test for it. From what I understand, this could break old code that > did something like computedStyle(elem, 'backgroundColor') instead of > computedStyle(elem, 'background-color'). This isn't a big deal in > MochiKit code because it never queries on properties longer than one > word. > > I'd like to get more feedback on these changes. Here's the ticket: > http://trac.mochikit.com/ticket/116 I don't see how it would change behavior, since camelize is going to be a no-op for already camelized names... >>> camelize('backgroundColor') "backgroundColor" >>> camelize('background-color') "backgroundColor" -bob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
